top of page

Recent Trends in International Arbitration: Perspectives for Mexican Companies

International arbitration has become a preferred method for resolving cross-border commercial disputes due to its efficiency, confidentiality, and flexibility. In recent years, several significant trends in the field of international arbitration have emerged, with important implications for Mexican companies engaging in global business activities. In this blog post, we will explore some of these recent trends, providing detailed analysis, relevant case studies, and practical advice for Mexican companies considering international arbitration as a means of dispute resolution.

Increasing Geographic Diversity in Arbitration

A notable trend in international arbitration is the growing geographic diversity in the selection of arbitral seats and arbitrators. Traditionally, cities such as London, Paris, and Geneva have been considered as the primary seats for international arbitration. However, in recent years, there has been an increase in the popularity of seats in Asia, Latin America, and the Middle East. This is partly due to economic growth in these regions, as well as government efforts to promote arbitration as a means of dispute resolution.

For example, Singapore has emerged as a significant arbitration hub in Asia, with its pro-arbitration legislation and well-established legal infrastructure. Similarly, cities such as Mexico City, Bogotá, and São Paulo are gaining recognition as arbitration seats in Latin America, offering an alternative to traditional seats in Europe and North America.

Technological Innovations in Arbitration

Another important trend is the increasing use of technology in the arbitration process. This includes the use of online platforms for document submission, virtual hearings, and the use of artificial intelligence tools for case management and decision-making. These technological innovations have been especially relevant in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, which has forced many arbitration hearings to move to the virtual environment.

For example, the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) has recently implemented an online system for electronic case filing, significantly streamlining the arbitration process. Similarly, several arbitration institutions have developed virtual platforms for conducting hearings, allowing parties and arbitrators to participate in the arbitration process from anywhere in the world.

Focus on Efficiency and Cost-Effectiveness

With the increasing competition among arbitration institutions and arbitration practitioners, there has also been a renewed focus on efficiency and cost-effectiveness in the arbitration process. Parties are increasingly interested in avoiding lengthy and expensive proceedings, and are seeking alternative solutions to resolve disputes quickly and effectively.

One such alternative solution is expedited arbitration, which involves the reduction of time frames and the limitation of evidence and arguments submission. This allows parties to resolve disputes in a shorter period and at a lower cost compared to traditional arbitration. Additionally, arbitration institutions are offering more competitive and flexible fee structures to attract clients and ensure that arbitration remains a viable option for resolving commercial disputes.

Case Study: Investment Arbitration in Mexico

A relevant example of international arbitration in the Mexican context is investment arbitration. In recent years, Mexico has been the subject of numerous investment arbitration claims filed by foreign investors, alleging violations of bilateral investment treaties and international investment protection standards.

One of the most prominent cases is the arbitration between Canadian company Methanex Corporation and Mexico, filed before ICSID in 1999. The company alleged that Mexico's restrictions on the importation and marketing of methanol had violated the provisions of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). After several years of litigation, the case was settled in 2005 with a settlement agreement between the parties, in which Mexico agreed to compensate Methanex Corporation for its losses.

Practical Tips for Mexican Companies

For Mexican companies considering international arbitration as a means of dispute resolution, it is important to consider several key factors. First, it is crucial to select the appropriate seat and arbitral institution, taking into account the experience, reputation, and cost of each option. Additionally, it is essential to draft clear and detailed arbitration clauses in commercial contracts to avoid disputes over jurisdiction and applicable procedure in case of conflict.

Furthermore, companies should consider including specific provisions on expedited arbitration or mediation in their contractual clauses, which can help resolve disputes more quickly and efficiently. Lastly, it is important to have specialized legal advice in international arbitration to guide companies throughout the process and ensure that their interests are protected at all times.


In summary, international arbitration remains a valuable tool for Mexican companies operating in a globalized business environment. By staying informed of recent trends in the field of international arbitration and following best practices in seat selection, drafting arbitration clauses, and case management, Mexican companies can make the most of arbitration as a means of resolving cross-border commercial disputes efficiently and effectively.

1 view0 comments

Recent Posts

See All


bottom of page